thp 1 cells (ATCC)
Structured Review

Thp 1 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 20907 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/thp 1 cells/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 20907 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Protocol to study the role of endogenously produced itaconate using CRISPR-Cas9 technology in THP-1 cells"
Article Title: Protocol to study the role of endogenously produced itaconate using CRISPR-Cas9 technology in THP-1 cells
Journal: STAR Protocols
doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2025.104304
Figure Legend Snippet: Validation of IRG1 KO by Immunoblot Analysis WT and IRG1 KO THP-1 cells were differentiated with PMA (100 nM, 72 hr) and subsequently simulated with vehicle control or LPS (200 ng/mL) and IFNγ (200 ng/mL) for 6 and 24 hr. The abundance of IRG1 is demonstrated by immunoblot analysis with β-Actin serving as a loading control.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Western Blot, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Endogenously produced itaconate is required to produce IFNβ protein WT and IRG1 KO THP-1 cells were differentiated with PMA (100 nM, 72 hr) and subsequently simulated with vehicle control or LPS (200 ng/mL) and IFNγ (200 ng/mL) for 6 and 24 hr ( n = 3 biological replicates for each timepoint). Data are represented as mean ± SD.
Techniques Used: Produced, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Representative chromatograms for itaconate, citraconate, mesaconate, and the 13 C 5 -itaconic acid internal standard (A) neat standards for itaconate and its isomers citraconate and mesaconate. Shown are the 129.000/85.100 m/z MRM channel for itaconate, citraconate, and mesaconate (blue; 50 ng/mL each) and the 133.926/89.100 m/z MRM channel for 13 C 5 -itaconic acid (pink; 100 ng/mL). Expected retention times for itaconate/ 13 C 5 -itaconate, citraconate, and mesaconate are 2.83 min, 2.17 min, and 2.73 min, respectively. (B) cell lysate from a wild type THP-1 sample stimulated for 24 hours with LPS and IFNγ (200 ng/mL each). (C) supernatant from a wild type THP-1 culture stimulated for 24 hours with LPS and IFNγ (200 ng/mL each).
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Itaconate levels quantified by LC-MS (A) Itaconate in culture supernatant and (B) cell lysate from PMA-differentiated WT and IRG1 KO THP-1 cultures stimulated with LPS and IFNγ (200 ng/mL each) ( n = 8 biological replicates for each timepoint). Data are represented as mean ± SD.
Techniques Used: Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy


![Ecotypes and cell‒cell communication networks in skin tumour microenvironment. (A) Heatmap showing the five ecotypes of skin tumours, which were inferred based on tumour microenvironment cell compositions. Bar plot showing the distribution of various cell lineages in each sample. (B) Pie charts showing ecotype distribution across tumour types and stages. (C) Pie charts showing tumour‐stage compositions across ecotypes. (D) Bar plots of enriched ligand‒receptor interactions for ecotype 1 and ecotype 4. (E) Cell‒cell communication networks showing MHC‐I signalling interactions in ecotype 1 and ecotype 4 (top) and SPP1 signalling interactions in ecotype 1 and ecotype 4 (bottom). Edge thickness indicates interaction strength, and colours represent different cell lineages. (F) Violin plots showing the expression of HLA‐A (top) and SPP1 (bottom) with associated partner genes (CD8A, CD44) across cell types and ecotypes. (G) qRT‐PCR showing Spp1 expression in RAW264.7 macrophages cultured with conditioned medium from B16 melanoma cells. (H) Western blot showing Spp1 protein levels in tumour‐associated macrophages (TAMs) after B16‐conditioned medium treatment, with corresponding quantification. (I) qRT‐PCR showing M2 polarisation markers expression in RAW264.7 macrophages after B16‐conditioned medium treatment. (J) qRT‐PCR showing SPP1 mRNA expression <t>in</t> <t>THP‐1</t> macrophages transduced with control short hairpin RNA (shRNA) (negative control shRNA [shNC]) or two independent SPP1 ‐targeting shRNAs (shSPP1‐1# and shSPP1‐2#) (K) Western blot showing SPP1 protein levels in shNC, sh SPP1 ‐1# and sh SPP1 ‐2# THP‐1 cells. (L) M2 polarisation markers ( ARG‐1 , MRC1 and CD163) were measured in shNC or sh SPP1 THP‐1 macrophages cultured with SK‐MEL‐28‐conditioned medium. (M) qRT‐PCR showing SPP1 mRNA expression in THP‐1 macrophages transduced with empty vector (EV) or SPP1 overexpression construct (SPP1‐OE). (N) Western blot showing SPP1 protein levels in EV and SPP1 ‐OE THP‐1 cells. (O) M2 polarisation markers ( ARG‐1 , MRC1 and CD163 ) were measured in EV/ SPP1 ‐OE THP‐1 macrophages cultured with SK‐MEL‐28‐conditioned medium. Data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 3 independent repeats. Unpaired, two‐tailed t ‐test; * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_9349/pmc12869349/pmc12869349__CTM2-16-e70611-g001.jpg)
